🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional district plan that may create up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to overturn a federal judge's injunction that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the delicate balance of power in elections, the order stated in explaining its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to use the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissent

With a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She contended that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was actually authored by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling occurs during a nationwide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican control. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several more conservative seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have countered with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party leaders lamented the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior House figure stated the court had another time damaged its standing by upholding a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.