🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.