🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, may align too neatly with the mythologized image circulated by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure persona of the president. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a invented security officer selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film based on a popular book sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The position was effectively a selection process with many candidates. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country in practice.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the process stated the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. His harder version prompted Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a small victory. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. He is signaled through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.